News

Trump tariff refunds to begin May 12 as CBP processes $166bn in claims

Posted on: May 05 2026

US Customs and Border Protection says the first electronic refunds from tariffs ruled illegal by the Supreme Court will begin as early as May 12, with up to $166bn in collected duties subject to repayment.

Summary:

  • US Customs and Border Protection said on Monday that the first electronic refunds from tariffs ruled illegal by the Supreme Court will begin as early as May 12, one day later than a prior estimate, per the CBP announcement
  • The revised start date for Automated Clearing House payments was disclosed in a message to shippers that also announced the availability of status reports allowing claimants to track refund processing, according to the CBP
  • A Court of International Trade order last week had indicated refunds would begin around May 11, with no explanation given for the one-day delay, per the report
  • Up to $166 billion in CBP collections derived from tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act are subject to repayment following the Supreme Court ruling, according to the report
  • The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump exceeded his authority in using the 1977 IEEPA sanctions law as the legal basis for imposing the tariffs, per the ruling

The United States is preparing to begin repaying up to $166 billion in tariff receipts after the Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump exceeded his legal authority in imposing them, with Customs and Border Protection confirming the first electronic refunds will flow as early as May 12.

CBP announced the revised start date in a communication to shippers that also introduced status reporting tools allowing claimants to monitor where their refund stands in the processing queue. The one-day slip from an earlier May 11 estimate, set out in a Court of International Trade order last week, was offered without explanation.

The tariffs in question were levied under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 law designed as a sanctions mechanism that the Trump administration repurposed as the legal foundation for sweeping import duties. The Supreme Court determined that using IEEPA in that way exceeded presidential authority, invalidating the collections and triggering the repayment obligation now working its way through CBP's systems.

The ruling carries consequences well beyond the refund mechanics. IEEPA had become a central instrument of Trump's trade policy, and its judicial invalidation removes one of the administration's most flexible tools for applying tariff pressure without congressional approval. The $166 billion figure represents the cumulative collections subject to challenge, making this one of the largest forced fiscal reversals in recent US trade history.

For businesses that paid the duties, the refunds arrive after months of margin pressure and supply chain adjustment undertaken on the assumption that the tariffs were a permanent feature of the trading environment. The May 12 start date marks the beginning of what is likely to be a lengthy disbursement process given the volume of claims involved.

---

A $166 billion refund pipeline flowing back to importers represents a meaningful, if one-off, liquidity injection into the US corporate sector, with the largest beneficiaries likely to be high-volume goods importers in retail, electronics and manufacturing. The scale of the refunds also underscores the fiscal cost of the Supreme Court's ruling for the US government, removing a significant revenue stream that had been factored into near-term budget projections. For trade policy, the ruling and its financial consequences narrow the administration's room to use IEEPA as a tariff mechanism going forward, potentially shifting leverage in ongoing trade negotiations. Currency and bond markets will be watching whether the refund disbursements affect Treasury issuance planning in the weeks ahead.

This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.
Australian factory input costs hit four-year high as Middle East supply disruption bites

Posted on: May 01 2026

Australia April manufacturing PMI 51.3 vs 49.8 in March, but headline flatters. Input costs fastest in 4 years, supply delays worst since July 2022. Output, new orders and employment all fell. Middle East war cited.

Summary:

  • The S&P Global Australia Manufacturing PMI rose to 51.3 in April from 49.8 in March, moving back above the 50.0 no-change mark, but the headline reading was driven by supply chain disruption and inventory building rather than genuine demand improvement
  • Suppliers' delivery times lengthened to the largest degree since July 2022, and because longer delivery times are inverted in the PMI calculation, this mechanically inflated the headline index
  • Input cost inflation accelerated to its fastest pace in over four years, with nearly 69% of respondents reporting a rise in input costs during the month; higher fuel prices were identified as the principal driver
  • Output price inflation also surged, reaching among the fastest rates in the survey's decade-long history, pointing to significant pass-through pressure building in the manufacturing supply chain
  • New orders continued to fall, with new export business declining for the first time in four months; output fell for the third consecutive month, with the latest reduction the fastest in 16 months
  • Employment was scaled back for the second consecutive month as firms responded to lower order books through non-replacement of leavers and reduced working hours
  • Despite lower output requirements, manufacturers increased purchasing activity and built stocks of inputs for the first time in seven months, with anecdotal evidence pointing to deliberate safety stock accumulation ahead of anticipated further price rises and supply delays
  • Business confidence fell for a third straight month to its lowest since July 2024, with the Middle East conflict, associated inflation and cost-of-living pressures cited as key concerns
  • Some residual optimism remained in the year-ahead outlook, with manufacturers expressing hope that an end to the conflict would bring improved demand and operating conditions

Australia's manufacturing sector posted a PMI reading above 50 in April for the first time since February, but the headline figure offers little genuine comfort. The index rose to 51.3 from 49.8 in March, but the improvement was almost entirely a function of supply chain disruption and defensive inventory building rather than any recovery in underlying demand. Stripped of those distortions, the picture is one of a sector under sustained and intensifying pressure from the Middle East conflict.

The mechanics of the PMI calculation mean that longer supplier delivery times, which are inverted in the index, add to the headline reading in the same way that improving demand would. In April, delivery times lengthened to the greatest degree since July 2022, driven by disruption to international freight and acute difficulties sourcing fuel. That single factor did more to lift the PMI above 50 than any genuine improvement in business conditions.

The three sub-indices that more directly reflect economic activity, new orders, output and employment, all remained in contraction. Output fell for a third consecutive month and at its fastest rate in 16 months. New orders continued to decline, with export business falling for the first time in four months as overseas demand softened. Employment was cut for the second month running as firms responded to lower workloads through reduced hours and the non-replacement of departing staff.

The inflation data is where the report becomes most significant for the broader economic outlook. Input cost inflation accelerated to its fastest pace in over four years in April, with nearly 69% of surveyed manufacturers reporting higher costs during the month. Fuel was the dominant driver, a direct consequence of the energy price shock emanating from the Middle East conflict. Output price inflation also surged, reaching among the highest rates recorded in the survey's decade-long history, suggesting manufacturers are passing costs through at an aggressive pace.

Against that backdrop, manufacturers took the unusual step of building stocks of inputs despite falling output requirements, with purchasing activity rising and input inventories increasing for the first time in seven months. The rationale was explicitly defensive: securing materials ahead of anticipated further price rises and supply delays rather than any expectation of improved orders.

Business confidence fell for a third consecutive month to its lowest since July 2024. The Middle East conflict, the inflation it is generating and broader cost-of-living pressures were repeatedly cited as concerns. Some optimism about the year ahead persisted, conditional on a resolution to the conflict, but for now operating conditions are worsening with each passing month.

---

The headline PMI number is misleading and markets should look through it. A reading of 51.3 driven almost entirely by supply chain delays and safety stock building is not a signal of improving demand conditions; it is a distress signal dressed up in expansionary clothing. The three sub-indices that matter most for genuine economic activity, new orders, output and employment, were all in contraction.

The input cost inflation reading at a four-year high, with output price inflation among the fastest in the survey's decade-long history, is the number that will concern the Reserve Bank of Australia. If these price pressures persist and feed through to the broader economy, the case for rate cuts weakens further. Business confidence falling for a third consecutive month to its lowest since July 2024 underscores the fragility of the outlook.

This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.
The FX Trader: Central bank meetings unlikely to provide the spark the market looking for.

Posted on: Apr 30 2026

FOMC forward policy curve entirely flat now.

The latest

BoJ fails to spark JPY volatility. The Bank of Japan meeting was read as hawkish initially on the monetary policy statement shifts on inflation risks, the raised inflation forecasts (core forecast for 2026 raised to 2.8% from 1.9% and 2027 to 2.3% from 2.0% previously), and a 6-3 vote with three hawkish dissenters wanting a rate hike at Tuesday’s meeting rather than a hold as opposed to the 8-1 vote at the prior meeting. Alas, the overall impact on the yield spread to the US 2-year was nil and Governor Ueda’s very two-way discussion of risks sounded typically dovish, or at least non-hawkish relative to the 65+% odds of a June BoJ rate hike. So USDJPY remains thoroughly stuck in the 158-160 zone for over seven weeks. If the war in Iran drives further jumps in oil prices and USD strength, we’ll likely have a significant test of the 160.00 level that Japan clearly wants to defend.

What to provide next spark outside of oil prices ratcheting higher or plummeting on headline risks from the Middle East? The US and Iran are at a stand-off now and oil prices will continue to ratchet higher as long as traffic through the Hormuz strait is mostly choked off. This will tend to weakly support the US dollar, especially as economic weakness fears intensify. More profound USD support probably requires an ugly meltdown in risk sentiment. On the flipside, the volatility potential for USD downside is considerable if any event clears a path to normalization of energy flows through the Hormuz Strait on a rapid schedule.

Four major central bank meetings on tap? Yawn. I previewed this week’s central bank meetings on Friday (ex-BoJ, I am including these below) and we already had the most important meeting of the week in the form of the BoJ. It’s hard to see significant surprises as monetary policy dynamism is not where it’s at for now. Rather, future policy geared at controlling yields and related policy that controls capital flows, the direction of the war in Iran and US-China geopolitics and the direction of the economy, especially the AI economy, are the issues at the fore.

CHF continues to trade on weak side – EURCHF and USDCHF both bear watching. The chief contributing factors here are the franc’s low policy rate, higher crude oil prices which both has other central banks looking to tighten policy, while it also pushes gold prices lower as higher energy costs will limit official purchases of gold and could even see some gold selling to finance. I still can’t help but believe that, at the margin, capital flows into Switzerland will take a hit from the disruptions of the war in Iran. I noted the technical weakness in CHF in Friday’s report and we are seeing additional weakness now, with key levels coming into view in EURCHF: the well-defined range high of 0.9267 and the 200-day moving average near the same level are nearby. In USDCHF, we’re simply mid-range, but a rally up to the 0.8000+ area could have huge implications for a significant rally higher – stay tuned. Elsewhere, note that CHF is even underperforming a weak JPY in CHFJPY, where the recent latest all time high above 204.00 was rejected.

(The four previews below are recycled from Friday’s The FX Trader report)

Bank of Canada (Wednesday): Little drama expected here, with Bank of Canada not seen moving off its 2.25% policy rate until possibly September or October – watching for wording around any urgency on inflation, but Canada is quite well insulated from the price and especially supply-shocks of other economies from crisis of global supplies.

FOMC (Wednesday): No expectations of drama. This should be, and most likely will be Powell’s last meeting as Fed Chair, with the “most likely” needed in that sentence because of the outside risk that Kevin Warsh is not approved in time for the June FOMC meeting. Powell’s term as Fed Chair ends May 15. The forward expectations for Fed rates are entirely flat through the end of this year and we are awaiting the transition to a new era at the Fed under Chair Warsh and how he will coordinate policy with Treasury Secretary Bessent and vice versa. Geopolitics, risk sentiment and incoming US data the week after will likely weigh more heavily than this meeting.

ECB (Thursday): ECB members generally guiding for rate tightening as long as energy prices threaten higher inflation – market will be looking for level of urgency as well as offsetting language around the concerns for the growth outlook that suggest a reluctant hike cycle. With a June ECB hike about 80% priced and two hikes more than fully priced through the September meeting, the hawkish bar feels a bit high (ability to surprise hawish).

Bank of England: Ditto on the ECB observations, although with no pressure on sterling, the BoE ought to keep its urgency low - two fully 25-bp hikes are priced for the three Jun-Sep BoE meetings – that’s the baseline. It’s a fractious MPC and we may see hawkish dissents wanting an immediate hike.

Chart focus: EURCHFEURCHF is approaching the key range resistance that is very well defined above 0.9250, while the 200-day moving average has descended into this area as well. EURCHF hasn’t traded for an extended period above its 200-day moving average in two years. CHF notably failed to act as a safe haven after the outbreak of war in Iran beyond the initial several days and it’s remarkable to see EUR outperforming the franc when the growth outlook for Europe dims with every nudge higher in oil prices.

Source: Saxo

FX Board of G10 and CNH trend evolution and strength. Note: If unfamiliar with the FX board, please see a video tutorial for understanding and using the FX Board.

The USD comeback is by no means a trend yet, while salient existing trends continue with no added energy, whether JPY weakness or AUD and NOK strength. AUD hardly stumbled on the slightly soft CPI release overnight.

Table: NEW FX Board Trend Scoreboard for individual pairs.

EURSEK looked interesting on the downside recently, but SEK often does poorly when there are shadows over the European growth outlook and the price action has backed up again there to flip the trend oscillator to positive, but the price action is still deeply in the shadow of the prior sell-off. Elsewhere, EURCAD shows the recent revival of CAD in relative terms and silver (XAGUSD) has joined gold in pushing into negative trending territory.

This content is marketing material and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..
John J. HardyGlobal Head of Macro StrategySaxo Bank
Topics: Forex Highlighted articles Trump Version 2 - Traders FR US Actualites et Analyses EURUSD USDJPY UKMustRead
investingLive Americas FX news wrap 24 Apr:Risk-on mood lifts stocks to records/USD lower

Posted on: Apr 25 2026

  • The NASDAQ and S&P indices close at record levels
  • Meeting between US and Iran may not take place until Monday
  • Global Central Banks decisions highlight next week's calendar: Market Volatility Ahead
  • Earnings next week: Big Tech takes center stage
  • Trump sends WItkopf and Kushner for talks with Iran. Vance is not going
  • US Dept of Justice drops probe of Jerome Powell
  • UMich April final consumer sentiment 49.8 vs 48.0 expected
  • Iran parliamentary speaker Ghalibaf has resigned from negotiations - Iran media
  • Canada February retail sales +0.7% vs +0.9% expected
  • investingLive European FX news wrap: Risk sentiment improves on expected US-Iran talks
  • Risk mood picks up on murmurs about US-Iran talks

The North American session leaned firmly toward a risk-on tone, with equities pushing higher, oil easing, and yields drifting modestly lower. The backdrop for the move was driven largely by renewed diplomatic momentum, as talks between the U.S. and Iran appear to be gaining traction- with Pakistan playing a central role. While headlines throughout the day were at times inconsistent and even contradictory, the broader narrative pointed toward re-engagement rather than escalation.

U.S. envoy Witkoff and Jared Kushner are reportedly en route, while Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi is also expected to be in the region. Current indications suggest that all parties may first meet separately with Pakistani officials, with the possibility of more direct engagement emerging as late as Monday. Markets are clearly choosing to focus on the potential for de-escalation, and that optimism helped extend the rally in U.S. equities.

That optimism translated into record-setting performance on Wall Street. Both the NASDAQ and S&P 500 closed at all-time highs, with the S&P rising 0.80% and the NASDAQ surging 1.63%. Leadership once again came from mega-cap tech, with Nvidia, Alphabet, and Amazon all finishing at record levels. Meanwhile, Intel stole the spotlight with a staggering gain of over 23%. The turnaround in Intel highlights just how quickly sentiment can shift—what was recently an avoided name is now being embraced, even at elevated valuations near an 80x forward P/E. It’s a reminder that markets don’t wait for perfection—they anticipate it. It is either that, or the markets are inefficient and subject wild irrational moves at times.

Looking ahead, earnings will take center stage next week and could inject fresh volatility. Wednesday features reports from Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Microsoft—a heavyweight lineup that will test the sustainability of the current rally. On Thursday, Apple, Caterpillar, and Merck follow, adding further depth across both tech and industrial sectors.

In the fixed income space, yields edged lower but remain within recent ranges. The 2-year yield declined by 4 basis points to 3.784%, while the 10-year yield slipped 1.7 basis points to 4.305%. Despite today’s dip, yields still moved higher on the week, with the 10-year up 5 basis points and the 2-year rising 7.9 basis points. Attention now shifts to the Federal Reserve, with the FOMC set to meet next Wednesday. Expectations are firmly anchored for no change in rates, with the current target range centered around 3.75%. The focus will instead be on guidance and tone, particularly as markets weigh geopolitical risks against easing inflation pressures.

In the FX market, the U.S. dollar weakened as traders leaned into the improving risk backdrop and the prospect of reduced geopolitical tension. Lower oil prices and expectations of softer inflation down the road also contributed to the move. Commodity and growth-sensitive currencies led the gains, with the NZD and GBP each rising around 0.50%. The EUR advanced 0.32%, while the AUD gained 0.34%, reflecting a broader shift away from defensive positioning.

Oil prices told a slightly more nuanced story. WTI crude for June delivery fell 0.87% to $95, while July crude dropped 0.74% to $90.15, reflecting optimism around supply stability if tensions ease. However, Brent crude painted a more cautious picture, rising $1.11 (1.08%) to $106.20—suggesting that not all market participants are fully convinced that risks have been removed.

Bottom line: Markets are leaning into a more optimistic geopolitical narrative, driving equities to record highs and pressuring the dollar. However, with major earnings, a Fed decision, and ongoing geopolitical uncertainty ahead, the current calm may prove fragile.

This article was written by Greg Michalowski at investinglive.com.
Why Netflix fell after a strong quarter

Posted on: Apr 18 2026

Key takeaways

  • Netflix beat first-quarter numbers, but second-quarter guidance arrived a little lighter than investors wanted.

  • The real story is shifting from subscriber growth to monetisation, retention and engagement across formats.

  • Netflix still looks strong, but the bar is now high enough to make “good” feel oddly disappointing.

Netflix gave investors a familiar sort of surprise on 16 April 2026: a strong quarter looking back, and a slightly softer story looking ahead. The stock closed flat at 107.79 USD in regular trading, then slipped to 97.35 USD after hours, down 9.7%, after management guided for second-quarter earnings per share of 0.78 USD and revenue of 12.57 billion USD, both below Bloomberg consensus.

That reaction says a lot about where Netflix sits today. The business still delivers solid growth, with first-quarter revenue up 16% year on year to 12.25 billion USD and earnings per share at 1.23 USD, but the market is now far less interested in what Netflix just did than in how smoothly it can keep the engine running from here.

Q2 2026 Forecast: Company Guidance vs. Bloomberg Consensus

Saxo Bank analysis. Netflix's Q2 guidance against Bloomberg consensus estimates across key metrics. Chart generated using ASKB by BloombergAI.

That mix matters because it shows where Netflix now sits in market psychology. It is no longer judged like a fast-growing newcomer. It is judged like a very large, very successful platform that must keep proving there is another lever to pull. This quarter said there are several levers. The market just wanted them pulled harder, faster, and preferably all at once.

A beat on paper, a miss in spirit

On the surface, the quarter looks solid. Revenue grew faster than expected, operating income improved to roughly 4.0 billion USD, and operating margin reached 32.3%. Free cash flow rose sharply to 5.1 billion USD. The catch is that part of the earnings boost came from a 2.8 billion USD termination fee tied to Netflix’s abandoned media deal, so investors were never going to treat all of that improvement as repeatable. Great quarter, yes. Clean quarter, not entirely.

That is why guidance mattered more than the headline beat. Netflix said second-quarter content amortisation will be the highest year-on-year growth point of 2026 before easing later in the year. In simple terms, that means the accounting cost of shows and films hits harder now, which squeezes near-term margins even if the longer-term content slate stays healthy. Markets tend to greet that kind of nuance with all the patience of a toddler in a supermarket queue.

The business is growing up, not slowing down

The more useful reading is that Netflix is evolving from a pure subscriber story into a monetisation and engagement story. Management kept full-year revenue guidance at 50.7 billion USD to 51.7 billion USD and still expects advertising revenue to reach about 3 billion USD in 2026, roughly double last year’s level. It also said recent price changes have gone well. That matters because it shows Netflix can still charge more while broadening the business beyond the simple old formula of “add members, raise price, repeat.”

Netflix is also trying to become what it calls a “must-have service”, the first place people go for entertainment and the last they cancel. That ambition now stretches beyond films and series into live events, video podcasts, games and a redesigned mobile experience with a vertical discovery feed. Whether every experiment works is almost beside the point. The broader industry implication is clear: streaming is no longer just a library business. It is becoming a time-spent business, competing not only with other platforms but with every screen-based habit people have.

Why the industry should pay attention

Netflix’s letter makes one point especially well: this company is still large, but not finished. It says it reaches an audience approaching 1 billion people, yet still accounts for only about 5% of global TV viewing and has penetrated less than 45% of its broadband household market. That is a useful reminder for long-term investors. The story is no longer about whether streaming wins. It already has. The question is which platforms become habit-forming enough to monetise that win across ads, pricing, formats and retention.

This also helps explain why Reed Hastings stepping down from the board mattered to sentiment, even if it changes little in daily operations. When a company is shifting from founder era to scaled institution, investors become more sensitive to execution. A guidance miss and a symbolic leadership handover landing together is not fatal. It is just not the sort of combination that calms a nervous market.

Risks worth watching

The main risk is not that Netflix suddenly stops growing. It is that growth becomes more expensive, more incremental and harder to impress investors with. If content costs keep rising faster than revenue, margin pressure will return. If advertising grows but remains too small to move the whole group, that future pillar stays promising rather than proven. And if newer bets such as live events, podcasts and games lift engagement without lifting profit, investors may decide the story is getting broader but not better. Early warning signs are simple: weaker margin delivery, slower ad progress, or evidence that price rises start to hurt retention rather than help revenue.

When good is no longer enough

Netflix’s quarter was a useful reminder that stock market reactions and business quality are not always the same thing. The company delivers a strong first quarter, keeps growing, keeps widening its offer, and still gets marked down because the next quarter looks a touch less shiny. That may feel harsh, but it is also the cost of success. At this scale, Netflix is no longer rewarded for simply being good. It is measured against the idea that it should be better every time. For long-term investors, that is the real lesson here. The business still looks strong. The stock simply reminds us that when expectations become premium entertainment, even a hit quarter can get a mixed review.

 

This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options.

Ruben DalfovoInvestment StrategistSaxo Bank
Topics: Equities Highlighted articles Netflix Inc. Netflix